"Nothing is more powerful than an idea whose time has come."
Alternate Website Access:
So what do I do? Do I flee Idaho with nothing? Do I grind through the legal process? Do I unite my neighbors, friends and family to physically defend against this terrible assault on liberty and the right to keep the fruits of my labor?
What you are doing to my family is a terrible tragedy to us. You seek to make us homeless. You seek to strip every possession I have from me, causing my family to be destitute. It is hard to imagine such a desire. All the words I spoke about what CPS agents, Meridian Police and St. Luke’s staff did were true and correct. That baby should have never been taken from his parents. He was in good care with his parents and they were working through the new challenge of introducing solid food to his diet. It is a shame and a major infringement of parental rights that he was ripped from his parents arms. That family came to St. Luke’s for help and instead were threatened intimidated and ultimately had their child taken.
You, as with St. Luke’s executive (your clients), have made a huge issue of criticism. Instead of moving on, through law-fair, you abused the courts in an attempt to completely financially destroy my family. I spoke freely and honestly about what happened to Cyrus and his family, I helped assemble people peacefully and we grieved the government for redress. We receive that redress, Cyrus was returned and the case against the family was dropped. Then you and your client sued me for exercising constitutional protected action (speech, assemble and grievance). Your client, St. Luke’s CEO, Chris Wroth, lied to the public, saying the lawsuit was just to make a point and the money would be given to charity (52 million?).
By misusing the courts you are seeking to make my family homeless and destitute, I have six children, young children’s. How am I supposed to deal with this attack? I have very little to pay for a defense in the courts, St. Luke’s has millions. That’s hardly a fair fight. So what do I do? It is so wrong what you and your clients are doing, how do I defend against it? Do I flee Idaho with nothing, leaving all I have for you to take and then start over somewhere else? Do I grind through the legal process with no funds to really fight back, allowing you and St Luke’s to look justified in your terrible assault on the rights of parents and freedom of speech, just to have everything taken from me anyway? Do I unite my neighbors, friends and family to physically defend against this terrible assault on liberty and the right to keep the fruits of my labor?
It is hard for me to know what God wants me to do right now, therefore, I have not yet decide if I will be attending the hearing today.
Ammon Bundy
Erik Stidham responded to letter and this Ammon's response back to him. You be the judge.
Mr. Bundy,
Please respond to my questions about today’s hearing.
First, do you have legal counsel for the fraudulent conveyance lawsuit? If so, please direct her to contact me.
Second, are you appearing at the hearing today? You must have decided by now. If you are, we will be calling you to the stand to testify under oath. If you are not appearing, please consider filing a non-opposition to the injunction. If you are not opposing the injunction, you can state so unequivocally in an email, and I will file that with the Court. If you would just be candid and clear, you could make things less costly for everyone.
Third, given that you chose to place your wife in the middle of the transactions regarding the Harvest Lane property, your gambit made Mrs. Bundy a witness to the fraudulent conveyance. If she appears today, we will also be calling her to the stand. I wanted to give you and her the courtesy of making you both aware that you will be called to testify under oath.
Fourth, if you or your attorney want to discuss stipulating to the preliminary injunction or any other matters that might make the hearing more efficient, please send me an email so we can discuss. Given the hearing is at 1pm today, there is limited time to discuss these matters.
Finally, as for your statements in your email below, you have engaged in this tactic many times before. We all know how this tactic goes. The first step is that you send Mr. Roth or me a letter or email like the one below that contains false, self-serving statements. Then you have your self-serving email or letter posted on the PRN website and on some sham news site like the Idaho Dispatch as part of your ongoing disinformation campaign. If you do have your email posted on the PRN site, the Idaho Dispatch or somewhere else, you should at least be honest enough to post this response from me and, more importantly, the attached Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. You followers really should read the Court’s findings.
As you know, the statements in your email below are false and have been demonstrated as false. Numerous witnesses testified under oath. 12 jurors listened to evidence for days and made a ruling. And, as evidenced in the attached Findings, the Court listened to all the evidence and reached her own conclusions. The facts establish that you caused incredible pain and emotional distress to people who did nothing but care for a starving infant who was at risk of death. You caused huge financial impacts. You attacked social workers and a Judge who were working to both make the infant safe and reunite the infant with his parents. You made false statements to get publicity and profit knowing that your false statements would cause emotional distress, economic loss, and would put hundreds of innocent patients at risk. Any honest person who heard the sworn testimony of the witnesses and reviewed the evidence at trial would find offensive your false claims of martyrdom and pleas for sympathy for the family that you brought into this through your actions. When you made and when you continue to make false statements, you certainly show no regard for the families of Mr. Roth, Dr. Erickson, NP Jungman, Dr. Thomas, Officer Sean Wilson, Kyle Bringhurst. Judge Fortier, or any of the others you harassed and targeted for harassment from your followers.
I have no interest in any more exchanges like this. Please stop sending emails or letters that are just part of your disinformation campaign. Please stop with the false statements that are in violation of the attached protective order. And please start respecting the rule of law as we worth through collection of the judgment.
If you wish to communicate regarding the lawsuit in order to make things more efficient, I would certainly welcome that.
Regards,
|
Mr. Bundy,
Once again, are you appearing at today’s hearing? Do you want to stipulate to the injunction to save time and costs?
As for your email of this morning, as I guessed, you are up to your same disinformation tactics to manipulate your followers. As I said before, I do not have any interest in participating in the disinformation and political theater used to grift your followers.
If you really want to mitigate the economic consequences of your wrongful action, you should retain counsel.
I do hope you posted the Findings of Fact on the PRN website.
Please stop violating the permanent injunction.
Please only contact me if you want to discuss the legal proceedings. Those are the only discussions needed.
Regards,
|
Ammon Bundy
Watch videos of evidence and determine who is lying for yourself:
St. Lukes doctors don't line up with the each other or the facts : https://youtu.be/egggLhByTb0?feature=shared
Evidence that CPS, Meidian Police and St. Luke's lied: https://youtu.be/T04KV7Ds6EA?feature=shared
This could happen to you: https://youtu.be/ToLyf6XW7r0?feature=shared
The Baby Cyrus Story in 25 Minutes: https://youtu.be/q84r7l8hqvA?feature=shared
How is St. Lukes, One of 13 Hospitals: https://youtu.be/odjnGcmla70?feature=shared
Corrupted Ada County Courts: https://www.youtube.com/live/SG4Ux3G_jjc?feature=shared
Much More Evidence Here:
Much More Evidence: https://freedomman.ws/cyrus/
All about the case: http://www.stlukesexposed.ws/
Now, you chose to make a statement with your behavior, bring in the politics, make a huge deal of this, but want st Luke's to not behave the same way? I don't think so. You started an unnecessary war, set the standard, and now you don't want to play by the playbook you created.
All I can say is I feel horrible for the children that will spend the rest of their lives as political pawns at the hands of selfish parents.
I agree with your values, but the way this was done was completely wrong. You make all of us non lefties look just as offbthe hook and out of reality as the left. That's not how we change this country. Shame on you.
Now, you chose to make a statement with your behavior, bring in the politics, make a huge deal of this, but want st Luke's to not behave the same way? I don't think so. You started an unnecessary war, set the standard, and now you don't want to play by the playbook you created.
All I can say is I feel horrible for the children that will spend the rest of their lives as political pawns at the hands of selfish parents.
I agree with your values, but the way this was done was completely wrong. You make all of us non lefties look just as offbthe hook and out of reality as the left. That's not how we change this country. Shame on you.
Article VI Supreme Law
Clause 2 Supremacy Clause
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SlJa2XWa7KI
************* Discovery ************
hard to believe? ************* Discovery ************
hard to believe? https://www.nytimes.com/video/opinion/100000007171122/protests-constitutional-rights.html
So therefore when the cops enforce illegal conflicting laws are a conflict with the supreme law of the land and all judges and lawyers attorneys and cops and government must not enforce and do what’s right. ????? so it appears???? so they must uphold all the things written in the iron clad contract/ the Constitutional contract/ there is no laws that can supersede the Constitution simple right ?????
Opening statement from the front lines.
1/ We must teach the government and the cops lawyers judges attorneys , that violating the bill of rights and dishonoring the oath is a crime, we must focus on making sure that cops lawyers judges and attorneys and government know the real laws v the fake laws made by legislative fiat and rules regulations that are in conflict with the real law the iron clad contract that all has swearer to honor and protect.
2/We need to teach the basic civic of the nation’s history and the three branches of power that is ignored. We need to stop the courts holding back two or more witnesses allowed during a lower inferior court process that is operating under the color of law and expose the high felony treason of the robbery of the masses the people we the people one of the people.
3/ We must make sur all understand that there is no crime unless there is a victim or property damage or a violation against the Constitutional contract, pertaining to the bill of rights and ours and yours as a American citizens fundamental principles and amendment provisions and articles and declaration of rights at all levels.
4/ We must restore enforce the enumerated power to the government and its original contract.
5/To the American citizens from our office the bill of rights offices across the nation overwatch for the masses and the nation as a whole, Dwane Kirkland UCC 1-207 w/o prejudice/ 14798803369 po box 32 London Arkansas 72847/ for full reports just call.
9/22/2022 3:24:20 PM
violating and committing crimes against the American citizens rights they who swearer under oath to protect, ignorant violators in there compacity of their powers granted to them under the 10th amendment, at least make them have some basic bill of rights classes, know the civic of the 11th grade and know their oath of office and have it ready to show they swearer to it and understand it.
This will save the nation from all enemies within and foreign. And hold the nation together for another two 50 years +
title 18 US suprema law of the land 241 242 operating under the color of law, what else fishing to create a crime under the color of law. violating the supreme law of the land article 6 p. 2. enforcing repugnant laws and unconstitutional legislative fiat pursuant to fraud, and acting as enemies within the nation’s sisters’ states need to be put back in harmony/
read the bill of rights and know it and teach it. Bill of rights in the public domain that for all sister state in harmony and all powers. https://youtu.be/31zRfrGU0P4
*Argument to defend the victims from the law enforcement when they violate the bill of rights at all or any compacity.
{Owen V Independence 100 vol. Supreme court reports. 1398 (1982)- Main V Thiboutot 100 vol. supreme court reports. 2502(1982)-officers have no immunity when violating Constitutional rights, from liability. Title 42 US Code Sec. 1983, Sec.
1985, and Sec. 1986 say the plaintiff can sue anyone who violates the Constitutional provisions. Case Byars V United States
273 US Supreme Court rulings 28- Encroachment. Miranda V Arizona 384 US 436-says no rule or law by legislation which would abrogate or abolish any Constitutional right provisions-
{All delegated power’s} {Under the 10th Amendment of the United States of America} all violations {Attach all writ of assist- coupon- bill of attainder-direct Tax} all pertaining to {violating Article 1 Sections 9, and 10 US Constitution} {Title 18, U.S. Code Sec. 2381- if they fail to protect Constitution, they are subject to the charge count 1- felony treason}
Case law Murdock V. Penn. 319 U.S. 105: (1943)-state may not impose a charge for enjoyment of a right by the beneficiary of contract. {Count 2 title 18 US code sect 241,242: if upon conviction the violator is subject to a $10,000 fine, ten years in jail, or both and if theft result, life in prison}
Any question please contact me or the victims in this matter to share the discovery and video and all evidence collected, thank you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20RoAfflGCM
The most important thing I can share is this, read the supreme law of the land and pay attention to the last paragraph that people failure to finish reading in motion or disposition or on the record or as evidence/ This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
https://officerkirkland.wixsite.com/website/about
https://deref-mail.com/mail/client/bKQT53SWFZA/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.history.com%2Fnews%2F14th-amendment-corporate-personhood-made-corporations-into-people
https://deref-mail.com/mail/client/qqYAp8cB6ao/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.justice.gov%2Foip%2Fblog%2Fsupreme-court-rejects-argument-corporations-have-personal-privacy-interests
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
‹ Third Amendment up Fifth Amendment ›
Citizen's arrest
A citizen's arrest is an arrest made by a private citizen – that is, a person who is not acting as a sworn law-enforcement official. In common law jurisdictions, the practice dates back to medieval England and the English common law, in which sheriffs encouraged ordinary citizens to help apprehend law breakers.Wikipedia
8/28/2023 5:42:33 PM
Well, the fact of the matter on a appeal the attorneys should be listed and there firms and a criminal complaint should be files and an objection on the Constitutional violation of the oath on the record .
Attorneys and judges and police officers all who was the wrongdoers in a collusion and operating under the color of law,
now listed as defendants, and to take their paper and effects. Bank accounts house cars monies account abroad, and even their wife and children’s accounts.
They the violators have no Constitutional protections of their lcc and their operating under the color of law. \\ courts corporations institution city’s town counties have no rights they are government,
the rights were made to protect the American citizens from encroachment and infringement and overreach of authority. All protections under the contract are for the American citizens not the government when they are at their government compacity.
They have committed high felony treason and should be brought to the military lawyers and military component tribune courts for breaking our laws in there compacity of granted authority,
under the contract that clearly violated the basic fundamental principles and amendments provisions articles declarations of rights down, when they are a government institution that are under the oath at all levels.
but based on their action operating under the color of law. and they should be dissolved, and the institution franchise be dissolved for public act violations and insurance coverage violations of civil rights and Constitutional merits.
Not to mention the attorneys and judges’ lawyers have equity involved in the matter, the judge has a conflicting issue of equity of making money across the bench in the matter. It is in order to file Q warranto and to dissolve them all court town city town county, and sate if necessary.
A warning should be filed for a Q warranto and appoint trustee and the state attorney general to be appointed to dissolve them all.
Mr Kirkland
Give this to your attorney and have him give one of these.
7/22/2023 9:21:10 PM
short read/ best weapon /Discovery / all states in harmony/ very lucrative if applied in a timely manner for any compacity of violations of the equal protections of the law. Fundamental principles amendments provisions articles declarations of rights, at all levels state and federal.
Pulling City Franchise A writ of Quo Warranto. Now this doesn‟t look like much, but let me tell you something. What we‟re talking about doing here…See, most cities, at least in the state of Michigan, are by public act 230 public acts or public act 287 public acts, and in every one of them there is a rights and powers section…usually it‟s recorded at 2.2 or 3.1, and it basically says “Subject to the constitution of the United States and the general laws of the state of Michigan, the City of or the township of has rights 35 and powers too.
Then it starts listing the powers: The right to have a police department, the right to have a fire department, the right to have a city hall…and it starts listing all these powers. The antithesis to the argument is that if they‟re not in the constitution of the United States and the general laws of the state of Michigan then they don‟t have any rights and powers. In other words they are in violation of their corporate charter; their franchise.
They promised that they would be within the constitution of the United States and the general laws of the state of Michigan. Now a lot of people don‟t understand the power of this argument, so I want to really push this one home. I want you to understand. Whenever these little townships and cities start acting like King Farouke like you don‟t matter and they don‟t have to listen to you, this is what I want you to do:
You ask them this question: Are you violating my constitutionally protected civil rights by however you claim they are. Because if you are, you have just waived your right to be the city of. They will laugh at you for a little bit, then you explain to them public act 230 of Public Acts which states the rights and powers section of the constitution of the United States and the general laws of Michigan. You have rights and powers.
The antithesis of that is that if you are not going to be within the constitution of the United States and the general laws of the state of Michigan, and you‟re going to violate my constitutional rights and trample my rights, what we are going to do here is go for a writ of mandamus and Quo Warranto. (That‟s the legal term). It is an ancient law that goes way back to England in the ancient times. Basically here is the judgment and the action for it.
You put down here the case. “The case came on regularly for trial before the honorable (_____) on jury trial or non jury, on the date of _____. ______counsel and ____ opposing counsel. The court heard the testimony and examined the proofs offered by the parties. The court considered itself fully advised on the premise and filed in its findings of fact and conclusions of law, and directed that judgments be entered in accordance with such findings.
Which means that they figured out they violated your constitutional rights, they didn‟t have the right to violate your constitutional rights, and in the hearing you showed they violated your constitutional rights, and the judge figured out they violated you constitutional rights. So now for your prayer for relief we‟re going to get this Quo Warranto. And that‟s exactly what happened with Dr Kevorkian. 36 Notice he was in jail and they were hammering the tail out of him. The next thing you know everything got real quiet.
The next thing you know they‟re letting him go, and they were minding their business. This is how it happened. It is therefore ordered and adjudged and decreed Defendant Corporation the city of _______has violated provisions of the act under which it was created, and also has violated provisions of public act 230 Public Acts sec. 2.2 rights and powers section…In other words they didn‟t uphold the constitution of the United States and the general laws of the state of Michigan. Defendant Corporation the city of ____accordingly has forfeited its charter and has become liable to be dissolved by the abuse of its power. How much money are we talking about here? Nine decimal points plus, wouldn‟t you think? Now do you think they are going to bother some little doctor when they‟re looking at shutting down a major city?
What do you think is going to happen? Everything is going to get quiet and they are going to let the doctor go. Same thing for you. Now, Defendant corporation _____ now therefore is dissolved, and the corporate rights and privileges of franchise of defendants are declared forfeited to the people. Defendant corporation ______‟s trustees, directors, officials, and other officers, attorneys, and agents are forever restrained and enjoined from exercising any of the franchise corporate rights and/or privileges previously exercised by said defendant city, and from collecting or receiving any debts and/or demands belonging to or held by defendant city, and from paying out or in any manner interfering with transferring or delivering to any person any of the deposits, money, securities, property and affects of the defendant city or held by it.
You name a trustee, which the state would do…probably the state attorney general...after your complaint is filed is appointed receiver of all the property, real and personal, things in action and affects of defendant city corporation held by investment by defendants or in or to which defendant may be in any wise interested or entitled to. Plaintiff…the people of the state of whatever… shall recover of defendant corporation city of ____, the sum of (damages real and personal).
They don‟t like it when you do that…cause you can go a hundred million three times that amount in punitive damages they get a little upset. As costs and dispersements of this action and the receivers is directed to pay the sum out of their pocket to whoever the attorney general stipulated there as an injured party. You can put down there “the honorable judge so-and-so presiding (date entered), and he signs that, the city is no longer a city.
When they violate your constitution, this is one of the most powerful tools that you can use. And when you jam this on you better wear a bullet proof vest to court, cause you‟re probably going to get shot at by the time you get home…But it‟s nice to threaten. Just drop one 37 of them in the mail and tell them If I don‟t get reasonable cause for my action in the near future, you‟re going to get one of these in the mail for real. Here is the summons for Quo Warranto.
This is for the start of the thing. Summons, form 41. By the way you can get this from 21 Am Juris practical forms and practice. Alright, you name the party, you put down who you are…The people of the state of Michigan v, you are summoned to appear before _____ court on such and such a date, to show by what authority you claim to have use and/or enjoy rights and liberty and franchise (namely the corporations city of) set out and complained of in such and such a time summons and further to do and receive all things which the court shall then order concerning you. This is kinda like pulling their driver‟s license for drunk driving.
Now that‟s an over simplification, but sometimes these city halls operate like a drunken sailor, and the think they can abuse citizen‟s rights, and trash them…”You know who I am?” “No, and I don‟t care…” You know who I‟m…I‟m your boss…I‟m the people. You‟re elected to work for me…And I‟m trying to be nice. So I‟d appreciate it if you‟d just…we can just sit down and work this out. But if we can‟t work this out, I‟m gonna sock it to ya, baby. And that‟s basically how I feel about it.
Now we can get into some of these other things… In the constitution of the state of Michigan…the latest and greatest…the very first thing they talk about…Notice it says section one…”All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for their equal benefit, security and protection. Equal protection in discrimination. “No person shall be denied equal protection under the law. Nor shall any person be denied of the enjoyment of their civil or political rights, or be discriminated against in the exercise thereof because of religion, race, or national origin. The legislature shall implement this section by appropriate legislation.
Then they go down through all these…freedom of worship, etc. This is what we‟re talking about here folks. You know your rights…You got „em…You don‟t know „em…You don‟t got „em. Get back into police powers generally. This is something you gotta understand. Generally the police power is the exercise of the sovereign right of the government to promote order, safety and health and morals, and the general welfare of the society within constitutional limits. Generally the police powers is the exercise of the sovereign of the government to promote order, safety, health and morals and the general welfare of the society within constitutional limits.
As otherwise stated the police power of the state is a power or organization of a system of regulations to 38 foster the health, order, and comfort of the people, and to prevent and/or punish injuries and offences to the public. But it has to be within constitutional limitations, and it embraces all the rules for the protection of life, liberty, and property.
*************************************** An impartial adviser, often voluntary, to a court of law in a particular case. "He was planning to advance this position in an amicus brief" In the sign of partnership begins with a drop of awareness about the nature of the arrangement. Most relationships are run by unspoken rules buzzing below the level of consciousness. It often takes a breach of those rules to be aware of them in the first place. So, welcome the breach. It's where discovery begins. https://gospelstudy.us/the-power-of-the-advocate/# Mr. Kirkland ***************************************************************************************************
Video | Facebook
https://youtu.be/fvvT6aJ3qt0
https://rumble.com/v2x486t-emergency-broadcast-public-domain.html
https://rumble.com/v2jqxoa-to-protectors-investigations-123.677.789999999-reading.html
https://rumble.com/v2etaya-bci-inv-constitutional-wisdom-law-part-a-reading-for-the-unversal-dismissal.html
Fact check: Ammon Bundy used edited video to falsely accuse St. Luke’s doctor of lying
Ryan Suppe
Mon, September 11, 2023 at 6:00 AM EDT·5 min read
Two weeks after a jury found that Ammon Bundy and his associate defamed St. Luke’s Health System, Bundy posted a social media video that used highly edited police body camera footage to falsely accuse a St. Luke’s doctor of lying to the jury.
The 14-minute video posted to YouTube shows Dr. Rachel Thomas, a former St. Luke’s lead emergency room physician, saying in police body camera footage that an infant at the center of a child protection case was “healthy” and “totally stable.” Bundy in the video suggests that the evidence contradicts Thomas’ court testimony, in which she told jurors the child was malnourished and could have died without medical attention.
“St. Luke’s witnesses and attorneys lied to the jury many, many times,” Bundy said in the video.
What Bundy doesn’t say in the YouTube video is that Thomas’ conversations with police and the emergency medical service (EMS) report he references both centered on whether the child was healthy enough to be transported, not whether the 10-month-old was healthy overall.
Last year, St. Luke’s sued Bundy and his associate Diego Rodriguez, after the right-wing activists lied about the health system online and led protests at hospitals where Rodriguez’s grandchild was being treated for malnutrition. St. Luke’s won the case by default because Bundy and Rodriguez failed to appear in court, and a jury awarded the health system $52 million in damages.
Among the “materially false and malicious defamatory statements” Bundy and Rodriguez made was that the infant “was perfectly healthy” when taken by Idaho’s child protective services, according to Ada County District Judge Nancy Baskin’s record of the defamation case. Bundy currently is facing trial for contempt of court charges after allegedly violating a court order that barred him from “witness harassment” and intimidation.
Bundy’s recent video uses the same edited police footage that Rodriguez, the infant’s grandfather, used in a previous video, which Thomas refuted in court.
“I had already determined the severity of the infant’s condition,” Thomas told the court in a sworn declaration commenting on Rodriguez’s January video. “Rodriguez is selling a lie, that the infant was healthy, based on wrongly edited video of me.”
Edited footage skirted references to diagnosis
Thomas was an emergency room physician at a St. Luke’s hospital in Meridian, where Rodriguez’s grandchild was admitted following a child welfare check on March 12, 2022, according to a transcript of Thomas’ court testimony.
The infant had experienced vomiting and weight loss in recent weeks, and the child’s parents neglected hospital discharge instructions following a three-day stint as well as multiple check-up appointments, according to Baskin’s record of events. The missed appointments sparked intervention by Idaho’s child protective services.
After an ambulance brought the child to St. Luke’s, Thomas examined the infant as a crowd of protesters gathered in the hospital’s ambulance bay. She diagnosed the 10-month-old with “severe malnutrition and dehydration that could lead to death if not immediately addressed,” according Baskin’s record.
Thomas then decided the infant should be transferred to St. Luke’s Children’s Hospital in Boise for “a higher level of care,” she told the court. She also told a Meridian police officer that she wanted to create separation between the child and the mob outside the Meridian hospital, according to body camera footage.
Thomas had conversations with fellow hospital personnel and law enforcement officers about how the infant should be transferred to the Boise hospital, according to the footage.
“I state that the infant is ‘medically stable’ and totally stable’ for transport, meaning that the infant will not likely have a cardiac event or other catastrophic health incident while being transported from Meridian to St. Luke’s Boise,” Thomas said in her court declaration. “I was not providing — and it would not be appropriate to provide — a comprehensive evaluation of the child’s health to the law enforcement officer.”
Bundy and Rodriguez’s edited versions of the footage don’t include Thomas’ references to the infant’s diagnosis. Immediately after saying the infant was “totally stable” for transport, Thomas said the child was diagnosed with “failure to thrive,” when a child’s weight is significantly below standards.
Thomas also went on to tell the officer that the infant had lost three-quarters of a pound since the child’s last check-up. That portion of the footage was not included in Bundy’s or Rodriguez’s videos.
Baby was healthy for transport, doctor said
Thomas in her court testimony also addressed the EMS report, which quotes her as saying the infant was a “healthy baby with no interventions.” Thomas said that’s not the language she used and her statement was taken out of context.
“With our EMS crews and for us as well, we’re required to document that we don’t assume there will be any loss of life during a transport,” Thomas told the court. “My statement to EMS was, the child was previously healthy with no medical conditions other than the malnutrition and failure to thrive we were addressing.”
“No interventions” referred to the fact that the infant didn’t need medication during a 15-minute transport to Boise, Thomas said.
Bundy could not be reached to comment.
Thomas, after facing online attacks from Bundy and his supporters, told the court that she planned to take a break from medicine and move her family to New Zealand.
“I have constant fear to be in my own home,” she said.
No mention of the report of the EMTs who picked up the child at the gas station and declared it healthy. No mention of the video on scene, with clear shots of the child, which showed that it was obviously not suffering “severe malnutrition and dehydration that could lead to death if not immediately addressed,” as Thomas lyingly claimed. That's just for starters of the clear points of contradiction in her story.
But Liberals gonna lib. Lovers of self, and therefore haters of truth.
At least we got rid of one Big Med's apparatchiks.
New Zealand will be a MUCH better fit for Dr. Thomas. Unfortunately, that's actually bad news for her. I wish her well, but I'm not hopeful. After all, it's one of the looniest of loony bins on the planet. They'll support her in her truth hating.
https://www.idahostatesman.com/news/local/community/boise/article279032224.html
Here's hoping his crimes land the kidraping America-hating FLDS Polygamist Shit in jail till he dies and rots.
Here's hoping you Nazis all get the Lavoy Finicum treatment soon, you childraping filthbags.